|
Are
Cancer Doctors
When nutritional supplements are used, either in addition to drugs, or instead of drugs, the results can be dramatic. Like in the 10-year Cancer Survey conducted by the Harvard Medical School in the USA. They recorded percentages of patients in remission 5 years after being diagnosed – covering all forms of cancer. The first group refused all forms of treatment. 6% of these were in remission five years later. Group 2 had orthodox treatment: surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy or a combination of these. 13% were in remission five years later - just 7% more than those who refused treatment. The third group refused orthodox treatment. They went on a nutritional regime instead. 68% of these patients were alive and kicking 5 years on... over 5 times more than the orthodox treatment group! But it gets even better - of patients in the fourth group who had both the nutritional regimen and orthodox treatment, 84% were in remission 5 years after being diagnosed. Patients on these combined treatments suffered far less from the side effects of radio/chemotherapy, than did those without the nutritional regimen. A new supplement, based on the shark’s super-powerful immune system was added during the final five years of the study. Though it wasn't used for a full five years, results indicated that around 93% would be in remission from the group using supplements plus the shark extract and conventional treatment! The nutritional supplements didn't and still don't treat disease. They simply feed your body what it's short of. Napoleon Bonaparte said, "An army marches on its stomach!" Meaning of course that soldiers can't fight and win when they're half-starved and weak. Nor can your body! Our soils are so starved of nutrients that plants should suck up, that we don't get all we need from food alone any more. Give your body what it needs and it can fight - and win - for itself! Who’d be afraid of cancer when 93% of patients recover? But it will likely be several years before the medical profession reacts. Years which you can use to protect yourself against degenerative diseases with cutting edge nutritional supplements your body can easily absorb. It took 30 years for the UK medical profession to respond to research - published in The Lancet in the 1960s - that could have saved thousands of babies from miscarriage, spina bifida, cleft palate, hare lip and other birth defects. But instead it waited until the 1990s to act. All that was needed was to recommend women of child-bearing age to take a supplement of 400mcg of Folic Acid every day. Especially if they were likely to become pregnant. Because folic acid deficiency was causing these problems. If it had been a drug it would have been rushed into use within a very short time. Probably without adequate testing too. But because it's a food element that drugs manufacturers can't get rich on, thousands of babies had to suffer and die first. This sort of occurrence isn't down to individual doctors, most of whom are genuine caring professionals. In most cases they aren't allowed to act without word from on high. Not being trained in nutrition, many doctors may have been unaware of thhis simple preventive measure. Meanwhile oncologists (cancer specialists) continue using the treatments that only enabled 13% to survive. They ignore the spectacular results achieved in the Harvard Medical School study and plod along on the same old ineffective path. When by adding a suitable nutritional regime they could save another 80 out of every 100. Dr Harold Shipman was a mass murderer. In condemning so many of their patients to death by ignoring the nutritional regimen, are these oncologists any better than Shipman? Or are they perhaps worse, because they are responsible for the unnecessary deaths of far more patients than Shipman murdered? Is it again due to the powers that be? The high-ups in the profession? The Chief Medical Officer to the Government? Is it the pharmaceutical companies flexing their powerful financial muscles? Or twisting arms up backs while simultaneously rattling skeletons in cupboards? After all, they do make their biggest profits from the drugs prescribed to cancer patients during their last few months of life. Whichever, it's causing far more deaths than folic acid deficiency in mothers did. You be the jury!
©2004 Natural Good Health Home • Articles • Snippets • Downloads • Forum • Newsletter • Links
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · |